投稿 @M4n5ter,分享有趣的事!
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/jMQV7F1_cPSaYOe4ElM_PQ

软件设计的另一角度

请记住这句看似保守、实则极其激进的软件哲学:今天写五行现在的代码,胜过明天补一行遗漏的逻辑。真正卓越的大型软件系统,从来不是靠”更复杂的技术”获得竞争优势,而是靠”更可依赖的架构”赢得时间的检验。当你成功地将所有变化都”关进”明确的边界盒子里时,开发速度才会真正掌握在你的手中。
https://artificialanalysis.ai

gpt-oss 系列在各项bench上的分数似乎一般
https://onesparse.com/blog/2025/07/01/billions-of-edges-per-second-with-postgres.html

数学家进入到图数据库领域进行了降维打击。当传统图数据库还在用深度优先和广度优先算法时,数学家用线代解决,图即是矩阵,矩阵即是图。在Postgres中每秒能够处理数十亿条边
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/YWp3zvZSnFnG2svND_YQ5A

对于目前ai应用(编程为主)发展的概览
https://zed.dev/blog/software-craftsmanship-in-the-era-of-vibes

If we have the ambition to pursue an amazing experience, but only some of the skills necessary to deliver it, AI can help us overcome the knowledge gaps standing in our way. It won't be a drop-in substitute for actual expertise, and we'll still make mistakes as we go, but it will let us experiment faster, learn faster, and iterate faster than we ever could in the old days.

AI可以帮我们克服知识差距。它不会是真正专业知识的完全替代品,我们在前进过程中仍会犯错,但它能让我们比以往任何时候都更快地实验、学习和迭代。 The Case for Software Craftsmanship in the Era of Vibes
https://g.co/gemini/share/594590b1dd61

通过ai了解知识,通常需要自身有一些基础,否则很难识别到ai出错的地方,而ai不会说自己错了,用户若不及时更正方向,ai会“欺骗”用户,在错误的方向上深入下去 ‎Gemini - rqlite 并发写入与 Raft 共识